Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

July 31, 2016

Hill Yes!

Something amazing happened this past week. For the first time in the history of our nation -240 years, 12 generations- a woman has been nominated by one of the two major political parties as a candidate for president. A woman has a serious chance at becoming the President of the United States.
A woman. Finally.

But as fantastic as the breeching of that barrier feels, we're not done yet. It is obvious from the incessant attempts to deligitimize Hillary Clinton's bid for the White House that sexism holds strong. Not just the overt misogynistic sexism of Trumpeteers who think calling women the C-word is acceptable political discourse or the memes that mock her clothes and looks. That is easy to spot and will likely always be with us. We can only hope to marginalize it as much as possible. I'm actually referring to a couple more insidious brands of sexism.

  1. The vague idea that Hillary is not qualified to be president. You see this from a remarkable number of women. "I don't really have a problem with her, but I don't think I can vote for her" A perfect example is Full Frontal's trip to the Mason Dixon county fair in which a female truck mechanic says that being told she can't do her job by a male truck driver is sexism, but cannot see that her refusal to vote for a female for president is sexism also. 
  2. The Hillary is a liar/criminal/corrupt mantra we hear from both the far right and the far left. This is also sexism. It is a documented actual real fact that Hillary is NOT a liar or a criminal. There is a whole website dedicated to fact-checking politicians' statements. Politifact says that Hillary is fundamentally honest. The attempt to turn her work as Secretary of State into a criminal enterprise in which she deliberately exposed all State Department secrets to cyberspies, willfully deleted millions of classified emails and caused the death of 4 Americans abroad would be dismissed out of hand had she been a man. In fact, when Bush's administration did the same, it was dismissed. The unending investigations are a concerted effort to deligitimize her work. Not a single investigation has turned up a single shred of evidence of corruption. 
All we have learned in decades of excruciating examination is that, like all the rest of us, Hillary Clinton is an imperfect human. Yet she is being crucified online for her alleged failings. She is being dismissed as "crooked" for no legitimate reason. The next time you think you might not vote for Hillary because she's a liar. Stop. Because the REAL reason is because she's a woman.

March 12, 2016

It's not okay

So with the protests and violence spilling over in Chicago and actually canceling a Trump rally there, Rachel Maddow did a piece (non-autoplay video link here) on Trump's escalating rhetoric and the relationship it has to this violence that we see at his rallies and no other candidate's.
"Anybody who tells you that there is no connection between the behavior of the mob at these events and the behavior of the man at the podium leading the mob at these events is not actually watching he's been saying from the podium. What he has been saying, and the way he has been egging it on, it has been escalating," Maddow said.
Back in Reconstruction South, the KKK exploited the fears of the poor white sharecroppers who were seeing freed slaves competing to take their jobs. The race-baiting led thousands of Southern (and some Northern) whites to lash out at blacks and institute Jim Crow laws in an attempt to maintain what they perceived as their superiority.
Hitler did a similar thing with the Jews of Germany (and later all of Europe) in convincing the poor, uneducated electorate that their economic predicament was due to "terrible" Jewish business practices.
Now we are seeing it with Donald Trump. He's whipping up fear of Mexicans and Muslims and dismissing blacks. He's tarring all protesters as thugs and encouraging (wink wink) his rabid followers to treat them as such. He offers to pay legal fees for anyone who "accidentally" roughs one up. He laments the era of "political correctness" which requires him to treat fellow human beings as human beings. He notes that back in the old days, it was okay to beat a protester and in the next breath expresses a wish to return to those halcyon days when white folks got to beat black folks at a whim.
And then he blames the protesters. And the media. And Bernie Sanders. And the Trumpbots parrot all that and add Obama and Bill Ayers and George Soros. In 1963 a lot of uneducated poor white people were saying it was all Martin Luther King, Jr.'s fault that 1200 Birmingham, Ala, students were arrested and hundreds injured when the police used water cannon and attack dogs to disperse the peaceful marchers. At Kristallnacht, many Germans believed the destruction of Jewish-owned businesses was something that the Jews had brought on themselves.
I don't know if Donald Trump believes even half the crap that comes out of his orange-tinted lips as he waves his stubby fingers about while ranting from his podium, but even if he doesn't, he's making it implicitly okay for others to act on their fear with violence and that will Make American Hate Again.

February 24, 2016

A nation of idiots

I am so disheartened by the "yuge" numbers of people supporting Donald Trump that I haven't had the heart to post anything much lately.
Am I the only one who is both revolted and depressed by the thousands of our fellow Americans who actually think this belligerent bellicose boorish bullying buffoon can be anything more than a failed celebrity? He has declared bankruptcy four times. He speaks less coherently than most 9-year-olds. His speeches all consist of him calling people he doesn't like (which is anyone who doesn't vote for him) variations of "loser" -or in the case of women "bimbo"- and taunting his competition. He has insulted every possible demographic in this country. He has absolutely ZERO clue how to run a company, let alone a nation.
And yet...


God help us all. We are certainly our own worst enemy.

February 11, 2016

My case for HRC

I've read more than a few opinions in the past few days from other feminists defending their support for Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton. Especially in the wake of comments made by Gloria Steinem and Madeleine Albright. (Although, in Albright's defense, she was just repeating a catchphrase that she's used for years -with awkward timing- that we, who haven't been paying attention, had not heard.)

Where I get annoyed is when the feminists try to argue that Bernie is a better feminist. Or that, feminism is not so important to them that they will support "just any" woman (as if Hillary Clinton is the same as any other woman off the street). I love the ones who argue that feminism gives them the right to choose. Yes. It does. But, and this is where women my age tend to differ from the younger generation, the gen-X feminist or Boomer feminist will look at two qualified candidates and choose the woman. Because she's a woman.

Yep. I said it. If there are two people applying for a job who are equally qualified --and no matter what your feelings personally, you have to agree that of all the candidates' job experience, Hillary Clinton is singularly qualified, but let's just say two people are equally qualified-- a feminist will always choose the woman. We need all the help we can get to even out the playing field. I fully admit to doing this on every ballot I've ever cast. All else-being equal, I always select the woman. For every job from city council to Supreme Court judge.

Alternately, feminist Bernie supporters argue how similar their positions are to Bernie's and how terrible Hillary is ("Corporate shill" they rant while sipping on their Starbucks macchiatos.)
But they fail to note two things.

First, Hillary's positions are not drastically different from Bernie's; they are just more modest. Hillary wants to subsidize college education to make it more affordable. Bernie wants to make it free. Hillary wants to improve on the framework of Obamacare to move it more toward a single-payer gradually. Bernie wants to overturn it with single-payer.
And all that corporate money collected by the DNC? Does Bernie give it back if he gets the nomination? Will it sully his candidacy? No? Only Hillary's? Hmm.

Secondly, all of the arguments against Hillary are based on over two decades of sexism played out in the media. We have a psychic image of Hillary as sleazy, or underhanded, or vicious, or Machiavellian all because of public partisan attacks that have added up to a giant NOTHING of wrongdoing but have somehow sullied her in our eyes. The people that supported Hillary back in 1993, still support her. Because she's smart and competent and not the evil incarnate that some people in the past have suggested. But unfortunately, because she is a woman who was subjected to endless media scrutiny from the time Bill entered the presidential race in 1992, we have no collective memory of her as a decent, remarkable person.

As and example, we see her time on the Board of Directors for Walmart as a black mark because of the pariah Walmart has become but fail to remember that 25 years ago, Walmart was not seen as an evil empire and Hillary's work on their board forced them to promote women to management positions that those women would not have gotten without her advocacy.

Most of the millennial women who are so fervently supporting Bernie Sanders are aware of Hillary Clinton only through the lens of the sexism and politics she's been forced to wade through. She has a sheen of grime from all she had endured and that is being held against her still. She didn't come to the race with only a voting record in the Senate and a strong tenure as Secretary of State. Those alone qualify her for the job of president. The fact that she mastered them as a woman makes her the better choice for feminists.

If you consider yourself a feminist, but prefer to support Bernie, that's fine. I can understand voters of either gender finding his message appealing and feminists come in all stripes and colors. But if you want to argue that feminism is very important to you, that it defines you, you ought to put your ballot where your mouth is. You can't purport to be a hard-core feminist and dismiss a candidate as competent and intelligent as Hillary Clinton.

January 21, 2016

What have I missed?

19 days later...

I was away on a fact-finding mission. I've been trying to find someone who actually thinks Donald Trump would be a good president. A real person, not Crazy Ann Coulter or Word-Salad Palin. Someone I might work with. Or have gone to school with. (Although --full disclosure-- if we're Facebook friends, I will unfriend you because I don't need that kind of lunatic bigotry on my wall.)
So far no one has admitted it formally. I can see that 4 of my Facebook friends "like" the Donald, but I can't see who they are. I can also see a horrifying 5.4 million people "like" him (on Facebook). I am fervently hoping (and I've never hoped for this before) that 5 million of those are fans of The Apprentice and Miss Universe. Please.

December 7, 2015

Back into the fray

Yes. I took a week (or so) off. I will probably do so again at Christmas. Tomorrow, I hope to return to regularly scheduled blogging. And NO, I can't bring myself to comment on the events of the past 10 days. It's all so disheartening.
I've been lobbying my representatives for better gun control laws since 2003. Twelve years. And nothing has changed. (Primarily because I do not have a "voice" --read: money-- as loud as the NRA.) But if all 78% of Americans who ALSO think guns should be regulated (just like it says in the Bill of Rights --"well-regulated militia") then maybe, just maybe, we can drown out the voice of the NRA.

November 17, 2015

Just stop

I'm disheartened and ashamed of the hatred I see everywhere for the poor refugees who are fleeing all they have ever known with only what they can carry to escape the evils of the IS terrorists only to come headfirst into our bigotry.

Stop. Stop letting irrational fear dictate your responses. Stop letting the terror induced by these despicable individuals color your impressions of all. Stop the hate. No religion preaches hate. Stop.

November 12, 2015

You are wrong.

When I went to journalism school, we learned that we had to tell a compelling story, but most importantly, it needed to be factual. If we didn't rely on facts and corroborate and verify those facts, we would become novelists. Granted, we also learned that the way you present the facts will color a story, but the emphasis, at least when I was in school, was fact-checking.
Either Fox Business News is not run by journalists, or they are deaf. What's the point of "moderating" a debate if you just let the people behind the podiums says any ridiculous think they want and offer no facts?

November 10, 2015

Women in power

Last week Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau took office and announced that his cabinet would be 50% female "because it's 2015."
  1. This is awesome.
  2. Sadly the United States is far behind at just about 25%.
  3. Iceland, Cape Verde and Sweden have a higher percentage of women on their cabinets.
  4. But still, this is awesome. And I don't even care that he stole it from the Onion.

November 3, 2015

Democracy

I voted today. We elected a mayor from a selection of two, three school board members from a selection of three, our councilperson from a selection of one, and three state-wide ballot initiatives. I waited in line for nearly 20 minutes.
I know that we say a lot about exercising our right to vote, but we might consider exercising our right to represent also. It seems a shame that I waited 20 minutes to participate in what was pretty much a fait accompli.

October 28, 2015

Are they still talking?

I will grant you that the moderators for the GOP debates thus far have been less than professional, with tonight's  bunch topping the list of atrociousness. But at the same time, I'm having a hard time getting upset about it since I think all of these clowns -as Trump would say- should be given the hook.

October 27, 2015

Or maybe look at it another way

I find political pundit Charles Krauthammer comically nasty. He is vaguely reminiscent of Wonka rival Arthur Slugworth with an equally appalling name. He is also nearly always wrong. I think he might even be incorrect more frequently than weathermen, but has still managed to hold a job despite it, and therefore contributed this tidbit to the new cycle: "Republicans in the Congress have shown they have no ability to conduct successful investigations of this administration. Everything they have touched has failed or backfired."

At which point, those of us dwelling in reality might point out that perhaps the investigations have been successful and there was nothing illegal to uncover in the first place.

October 22, 2015

Hill on the Hill

I'll admit to being partial and taking sides during the #BenghaziCommittee hearings today, but even still, man did the GOP make asses of themselves. 
Prior to today's testimony, 72% of voters saw the committee as partisan. After today, I would be shocked if it was less that 90%. Gowdy began the morning taking pains to justify the whole ordeal and they proceeded to dismantle that premise throughout the day with every question the asked. 

October 21, 2015

He did what?

Yesterday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may have become the first Jewish Holocaust-denier.
Today, Germany set the record straight.
“All Germans know the history of the murderous race mania of the Nazis that led to the break with civilization that was the Holocaust. [...] We know that responsibility for this crime against humanity is German and very much our own.”




For a more nuanced fact-check, see the Washington Post.

October 6, 2015

It's like a car wreck

It is a sad state of affairs that headlines like this are NOT from the Onion:
Ben Carson would skip meeting families of Oregon mass shooting but ‘would probably go to the next one
I suppose at least he's planning ahead...

As stupidly insensitive as that is, at least it isn't downright insulting and false. Marco Rubio wins the prize for that one by suggesting no, SAYING OUTRIGHT that women "look forward" to having abortions so they can get rich off selling the fetal tissue. Yes, he did.

The staff at the Onion is panicking because they can't come up with more ridiculous fake news that could top these two. 

September 23, 2015

WWJD

I'm not a fan of religion. I will not try to talk you out of your personal beliefs, but I will fight your imposition of those beliefs on others. For this reason, I've never been a big fan of the Catholic Church which thinks that because they believe that Catholic women should be baby machines, every woman should be denied birth control and safe, legal abortions.
I give them credit for avoiding the hypocrisy of the Religious Right protestants (who used to be called Evangelicals) in that Catholics do not support killing any human being, while the Christian Conservatives have no problem killing adults who they feel "deserve" it.
But, I do have to say, aside from women's issues, I really like this new Pope. He seems to be trying to drag the Catholic Church back into the time when it was the catholic church and represented Jesus's teachings.
Rejecting a dinner invitation from Congress to dine with the homeless, is so Matthew 25:30-40.

September 21, 2015

Oh, Ben!

Blogging is becoming as irrelevant as Ben Carson's interpretation of the U.S. Constitution.

September 16, 2015

Leader of the free world?

The second GOP debate is tonight. If you watch it drunk, you can almost understand why Trump is in the lead.
Clowns.

August 26, 2015

Votes for Women!

It's the 95th anniversary of the 19th amendment to the U.S. Constitution giving women the right to vote. That's right, 50 years --one half century-- AFTER freed (male) slaves got the vote, women were deemed human enough to cast a ballot.
Two things:
  1. Why did we throw it away on a doucheticket like Warren Harding?
  2. Why do we share this momentous anniversary with 'National Dog Day'?

voting is for the dogs women

August 24, 2015

All I'm saying about that man

I've been tempted to write about Trump recently, but have held back simply because too many people are talking about him. So I'm just going to say this: 
The fact that this arrogant, ignorant asshat is the front-runner in the race for the GOP nomination for PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES is so horrifying and desperately sad, that I fear for my country. Seriously.
If the racist jerks who feared an Obama presidency felt even ONE QUARTER of the trepidation and revulsion I feel for "the Donald" then I empathize. The difference being, Obama wasn't an incompetent buffoon who made our nation a laughing stock, whereas --even before the election-- by virtue of his leading in the polls, Trump has managed to elicit the scorn of every civilized country on Earth.
Enough. Please.