In fact, I find it offensive that all women are not supporting her. She deserves to win. She's smart, politically astute, and (judging by the past) refuses to suck up --literally and figuratively-- to any man.
CNN says, exit polls showed women 18-59 in Iowa supported Obama. As a woman aged 18-59, I'm putting my vote where my cleavage is. It's about time this country was led by a woman. God knows the men have screwed it up for long enough.
6 comments:
Perhaps you should do a bit of historical reading before you place your vote. I think that, if you truly are as intelligent as some of your posts seem, you'll replace the emotional with the logical and make a change in your preference. Hilary Clinton's past, in Arkansas, Washington, and New York truly speaks for itself, especially if you delve in below the surface.
Voting for a woman simply because she's a woman? No way, I'll abandon my gender in a heartbeat. I don't want the first woman president to be someone like Hillary. She'll set us back 100 years!
Punkinsmom, I'm with you!!
I'm amazed at the venom. I shouldn't be, but I am. As to anonymous who claims that Mrs. Clinton would set "us [women] back 100 years" I only have this to reference, which is hardly what a female president of any caliber, let alone Hillary Clinton's would do.
To the first anonymous, your post is too vague for me to address. If you have some issue with Mrs. Clinton's governance beyond the general antipathy voiced in your post, please don't hesitate to spell it out.
I almost didn't respond to the two anons, but I couldn't seem to help myself when I read the "set us back" line. Usually any comments here would stand on there own. And a big hello to Sunshine!
Wankers.
If someone won't even use an online handle, I'd delete them.
Thank you and thank you and thank you.
Also I agree with jim.
Post a Comment