Showing posts with label headlines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label headlines. Show all posts

October 6, 2015

It's like a car wreck

It is a sad state of affairs that headlines like this are NOT from the Onion:
Ben Carson would skip meeting families of Oregon mass shooting but ‘would probably go to the next one
I suppose at least he's planning ahead...

As stupidly insensitive as that is, at least it isn't downright insulting and false. Marco Rubio wins the prize for that one by suggesting no, SAYING OUTRIGHT that women "look forward" to having abortions so they can get rich off selling the fetal tissue. Yes, he did.

The staff at the Onion is panicking because they can't come up with more ridiculous fake news that could top these two. 

January 15, 2014

squirrel-Qaeda operative eliminated

Just wanted to give a shout out to the boys (and girls) in blue of Guilford, Conn. Keeping America safe from terror.

November 13, 2013

Mmmmm, bacon

To those of us who aren't familiar with the art world, the headline "Bacon painting fetches record price" ends up being pretty disappointing.

July 15, 2013

Aquitted

There is a quote that's circulating on Facebook that I think perfectly sums up the verdict in the Trayvon Martin murder trial. "The fundamental danger of an acquittal is not more riots, it is more George Zimmermans."
Exactly. All the white panic over on Fox that race riots were going to break out across the nation is ridiculous. What is going to break out, at least across Florida, is more vigilantism. Because that is what this stupid law endorses.

March 27, 2013

Red equals

For those of you who are on Facebook, you may have noticed that yesterday, it seemed like the whole place was populated with red boxes. (If you didn't notice this, it means the majority of your friends are either non-conformists, older than your grandmother, or douchebags. Or any combination of the three.) Everyone else changed their profile picture to a red equal sign in solidarity with marriage equality.
Yesterday, oral arguments were heard by the Supreme Court on the unconstitutionality of California's "Prop 8" which defined marriage as between "one man and one woman." The U.S. District court struck it down as unconstitutional last year.
This got all the people who are afraid of buttsex up in arms because it was a LAW! (Like we've never had unconstitutional laws in this country, Jim Crow.) And because it was a known fact that the judge who ruled that defining marriage under such narrow parameters was in violation of the "equal protection under the law" clause of the Constitution liked the buttsex himself.
We won't see a ruling on this particular case from SCOTUS until June, (at which time you'll probably see more equal signs) but what it comes down to, what it always comes down to in institutionalized discrimination, is fear.
I don't know if same-sex marriage opponents are afraid of turning gay, of being near gay, of touching gay, of having to explain gay to their kids, or some other amorphous gayness. I just know that in all the bizarre, contorted ways they try to justify their position, to rational, intelligent people they just come across as ignorant and frightened.

November 7, 2012

August 2, 2012

Shh

Some one needs to explain the meaning of the word "secret."

Obama authorizes secret support for Syrian rebels

December 20, 2011

Just ignore that

Live Science provides us with this intriguing headline: Democracy May Depend on the Ignorant
Unfortunately, as the story goes on to describe the study in question, we learn that ignorance is only helpful in schools of fish.
The scientists stressed that the results of the study cannot be extrapolated to decision-making in human groups. [University of Washington evolutionary biologist] Bergstrom explained that opinionated individuals in the models could not spend extra time lobbying the others and couldn't make false claims about an option, as humans can.
It's those damn lobbyists again. And please note, fish are better at democracy than humans.




November 29, 2011

How do you seize a website?

This site is the real thing. Do you know how you can tell?
The Feds did not seize it in their crackdown.

"Feds seize 150 websites in counterfeit crackdown"

June 13, 2011

Celebrate!

What I love is the exclamation point.


Prince William and Kate Middleton Celebrate Prince Philip's Birthday!

The man is 90. Admittedly, he must be pleased about reaching such an impressive milestone, but the rest of us? I don't think his grandson and new granddaughter-in-law sharing some birthday cake is as exciting to him as getting through the day without passing gas in front of the servants.

January 13, 2011

At least we have cable

A recent article on LiveScience announced, "Neanderthals Had Similar Life Spans to Modern Humans," which leads me to the thought, "so much for all that penicillin and medical advancement."
Turns out the headline is a bit misleading to the average reader. Modern Humans is not us now, but early modern humans. Still, for all our scientific advancement, our lifespans are not significantly greater than 1000 years ago. Statistically, we appear to be living longer, but that's because we've made great strides in infant mortality. (Lots of babies who don't make it past the first year of life tends to skew the average life expectancy age downward.)
In fact, if you lived past age 15 in 1100, your chances of living to the age of 70 were about the same as they are now.
My favorite line in the article (and the reason I'm posting about it), however, speaks to the fact that the genus homo has a long history of treating its seniors poorly. Nowadays we have questionable nursing homes that smell of urine and disinfectant while the game show network plays at full volume all day long. Back in Neanderthals' time the nomadic lifestyles to search for their next meals "likely mean[t] any older members who could not keep up were left behind to die, and their remains would have been scattered by scavengers and lost from the fossil record."
Sorry, Grandma.

December 9, 2010

What?

October 27, 2010

Squirrel terrorizes Columbus school

Yet another suicide attack. (Even the headline writers recognize squirrels' terrorist tendencies.)

"A Columbus school was put on lock-down Monday because people thought they heard gunfire in the area. What they heard, in fact, was a fearsome squirrel that had gotten into an electric transformer.
The resulting noise at Brookhaven High School alarmed officials enough that they put the school on alert shortly after 8 a.m. — about a half-hour into the school day.
The lock-down was lifted shortly after 8:30 a.m., when officials figured out barbecued squirrel was the source of all their problems."

But at least they got some barbecue out of the deal.

September 16, 2010

Smite

This is an older article from LiveScience, but the headline "Acts of God: Why Lightning Strikes Religious Symbols" is so worth it. And the final sentence provides the win: "In a way, you could say that lightning bolts are nature's retribution for the sin of vanity, since anyone who erects the tallest structure in the area surely has no shortage of pride."

Apparently, nothing attracts electricity like a 3-storey styrofoam Jesus.

February 1, 2010

Creepy headlines

Must be the full moon, the headlines this weekend were somewhat akin to a 5-car pile-up on the interstate. You want to look away, but you just can't.

How Life Without Sex Works -is this something we need to know?
Pork better for sex than Viagra? -is this something we need to know?
Sticky, smelly Bag Balm: Problem-salving for all -we've moved on to puns.
Pastor accused of pulling gun on son at church -that's one way to get your kids to church
Man Says He Was Shot, Robbed Near Bar -you would think the news people would verify this, yes?
Libya overturns Swiss man's jail -Libya is strong enough to overturn a jail.
and my personal favorite:
Plan to halve smokers in 10 years -well, that's one way to get people to stop smoking.

September 24, 2009

Evolutionary

On yesterday's livescience.com, the headline promised, "Evolution Can't Go Backward." So how do we explain politicians?

June 23, 2009

Film at eleven

It took all of 9 minutes after the announcement by Kodak that they are retiring their Kodachrome film for the headline writers to quote Paul Simon. What's vexing (yes, I said vexing) is that the journalists were obligated to include lyrics in the actual article. I assume because the young'uns don't know the song.
Most of us born in the 60s or prior, heard the damn thing in our heads as soon as we saw the word. The teens are scratching their heads that film still exists at all.

March 31, 2009

Orgasmatron

I read this article, because -really- how can you not with a headline like: "Sex with Robots: How Humanity Is Screwing Itself"?
It's really more about how technology is taking over more aspects of our lives. And it is upfront about being a commentary. But one part really struck me. The author asks, "Will this simulated sex get so good as to convince us that it's the real thing? How will we know if it isn't?"
How will we know? And what if it's better? Mmmmm... better. Think of all the dirty socks you'll never have to pick up again.